Opinion: Why Everything Is Unfolding as Planned in Today’s Rapidly Changing World

In a recent dialogue, Gail Collins and Bret Stephens delve into the implications of President Trump’s tariffs. Bret deems them potentially the worst presidential decision ever, likening their fallout to historical blunders like the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, predicting severe repercussions for global alliances and economic leadership. He warns that such upheavals could lead to conflict, reflecting deep-rooted economic dependencies and international trust.

The conversation shifts as they explore Trump’s controversial allies, like Laura Loomer, with Bret comparing her influence to the notorious Rasputin. With both analysts discussing the evolving dynamics within the political landscape, they ponder how these shifts affect party ideologies, especially the Democratic party’s newfound positions on issues like trade and government engagement in education.

While Gail expresses concern about educational inequalities tied to school choice, Bret argues for its potential to elevate underprivileged students. Their exchange unfolds into a broader reflection on the changing nature of political affiliations and strategies, highlighting a palpable tension in contemporary politics. As they navigate this complex terrain, they touch on the role of future candidates and the need for parties to redefine their core messages.

The discussion ends on a poignant note, paying tribute to Richard Bernstein, emphasizing the lasting impact of authentic journalism on society.